Sorry about "Yet Another Vulnerability Patch" hiccup. We are now running 2.5.2 https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/releases/tag/v2.5.2
Sorry about that hiccup. Needed to update our instance to 2.5.1 which fixes a vulnerability problem. https://github.com/tootsuite/mastodon/releases
Starting to worry about how many pages are going to end up like this. JS-free fallbacks aren't just about people who turn JS off in their browsers!
my inaugural post may as well be a job: Digital Initiatives Projects Librarian https://careers.ualberta.ca/Competition/A101736855/
BEGIN KEYBASE SALTPACK SIGNED MESSAGE. kXR7VktZdyH7rvq v5weRa0zkMAxdLK jxOeJPWkZAK7x6C i45mW8uoVYgq3Dx 4Vg84Btyj3QRkjb avwQHqQRihANnEq sEkMr50Qy19drqO k1Uj8l35hNkPyMW zu8TL7jtbinDhu3 fy9LRI5zOmmYfDs IYOMvglkSMzvP66 5iKLpqh2OsqmAwL OHdeUNVQGFljinV ldnQOJngfQDDznO 1RnRZE0YJOA9I4E lLZ3ovADQIaEEXH TC. END KEYBASE SALTPACK SIGNED MESSAGE.
2. Documentation efforts must go beyond what can be collected without permission from the web and social media. Social media collected with the consent of content creators can form a part of richer documentation efforts that include the collection of oral histories, photographs, correspondence, and more. Simply telling the story of what happens in social media is not enough, but it can be a beginning.
1. Archivists must engage and work with the communities they wish to document on the web. Archives are often powerful institutions. Attention to the positionality of the archive vis-à-vis content creators, particularly in the case of protest, is a prime consideration that can guide efforts at preservation and access.
The Documenting the Now project (which I've been lucky to be a part of) published its ethics white paper today about archiving social media in times of protest.
The findings in short are:
code4lib.social is a GLAM-themed Mastodon Instance.